Idea napkin part 2
1.) I am Jacelynn Anaya a smart, goofy young women who will never give up hope of her dreams, goals and aspirations until the very end. I am skilled mainly in optimism, kindness, determination , handling animals, and being patient ( its a useful gift). I have worked in both animal and athletic industries, I prefer the animal industry because it correlates with my major and I enjoy helping others.
2.) I am offering security of choice. Knowing that both parties are benefiting mutually from this adoption process. This is supposed to make a trip to the animal shelter less stressful and ease emotions toward the rest of the animals in the building.
3.) Any one looking to adopt is welcome to use it but this would specifically target serious adopters, first time adopters, or young/ unsure adopters. Business wise my customers would be animal shelters, I am talking county shelters.
4.) They care because animals in shelters have been trauma, stress, and anxiety with no one to help them deal with it. People also may suffer from these things or want to help but just don't know how. Most people wouldn't adopt an animal if they at least didn't care about the animal its self, in some degree.
5.) The matching system has been In place in regards to breeds a person should have or what type of pet they should have but it has never been put toward an organizational setting. Some rescues have it for special needs animals or due to their small size they can account for all the animals that reside there, but bigger and densely populated shelters can't. This system, doesn't exist in shelter environments, it is all paper and human based.
Feedback memo:
1.) My intentions were not clear enough. I got this one mostly from people who read my napkin who are friends and family of mine. I made sure this time to be as clear as possible without straying away from the question.
2.) How it would work in the adoption process. I did incorporate this a bit more than I did last time but I did not mention it in great detail because I feel that this is not the place to talk about that.
I believe these elements do fit together better than the last napkin. I am missing financials, but I think that it correlates to what I find the most important which is not my profit nor the money I gain by selling this product, its about the impact I could make. As I stated earlier I think I am more clear about the purpose of my system and how it works, I know that I can be vague about the logistics of the product but I feel this time I gave the right information in regards to the questions. I think the weakest link I have is the plausibly of my product, not that it can't work but how many shelters would actually participate in having my product. especially if they have their own system that has worked for them more times then not.
2.) I am offering security of choice. Knowing that both parties are benefiting mutually from this adoption process. This is supposed to make a trip to the animal shelter less stressful and ease emotions toward the rest of the animals in the building.
3.) Any one looking to adopt is welcome to use it but this would specifically target serious adopters, first time adopters, or young/ unsure adopters. Business wise my customers would be animal shelters, I am talking county shelters.
4.) They care because animals in shelters have been trauma, stress, and anxiety with no one to help them deal with it. People also may suffer from these things or want to help but just don't know how. Most people wouldn't adopt an animal if they at least didn't care about the animal its self, in some degree.
5.) The matching system has been In place in regards to breeds a person should have or what type of pet they should have but it has never been put toward an organizational setting. Some rescues have it for special needs animals or due to their small size they can account for all the animals that reside there, but bigger and densely populated shelters can't. This system, doesn't exist in shelter environments, it is all paper and human based.
Feedback memo:
1.) My intentions were not clear enough. I got this one mostly from people who read my napkin who are friends and family of mine. I made sure this time to be as clear as possible without straying away from the question.
2.) How it would work in the adoption process. I did incorporate this a bit more than I did last time but I did not mention it in great detail because I feel that this is not the place to talk about that.
I believe these elements do fit together better than the last napkin. I am missing financials, but I think that it correlates to what I find the most important which is not my profit nor the money I gain by selling this product, its about the impact I could make. As I stated earlier I think I am more clear about the purpose of my system and how it works, I know that I can be vague about the logistics of the product but I feel this time I gave the right information in regards to the questions. I think the weakest link I have is the plausibly of my product, not that it can't work but how many shelters would actually participate in having my product. especially if they have their own system that has worked for them more times then not.
Comments
Post a Comment